Understanding the Brownian movement is crucial because it forms a base for modern atomic theory. Also, the kinetic theory of gases is based on the Brownian motion model of particles. The mathematical models that describe the Brownian motion are used in various disciplines such as Physics, Maths, Economics, Chemistry, and more. The Brownian movement in chemistry, which is also called Brownian motion, can be defined as the erratic or uncontrolled movement of particles in fluid because of their constant collision with other fast-moving molecules.
In general, this random movement of a particle can be observed to be stronger in the less viscous liquid, smaller sized particles, and at a higher temperature. There also exist other factors that affect the movement of particles in a fluid. One of such most common examples of the Brownian motion can be given as diffusion. The cases where calcium diffused in bones or pollutants are diffused in the air can be considered examples of this effect. We can see the Brownian motion effect in all types of colloidal sol.
Brownian motion is considered a Gaussian process and a Markov process with continuous path occurring over continuous time. Because the movements of atoms and molecules in a liquid and gas is random, over time, larger particles will disperse evenly throughout the medium. If there are two adjacent regions of matter and region A contains twice as many particles as region B, the probability that a particle will leave region A to enter region B is twice as high as the probability a particle will leave region B to enter A.
Diffusion , the movement of particles from a region of higher to lower concentration, can be considered a macroscopic example of Brownian motion. Any factor that affects the movement of particles in a fluid impacts the rate of Brownian motion. For example, increased temperature, increased number of particles, small particle size, and low viscosity increase the rate of motion.
Most examples of Brownian motion are transport processes that are affected by larger currents, yet also exhibit pedesis. The initial importance of defining and describing Brownian motion was that it supported the modern atomic theory. Today, the mathematical models that describe Brownian motion are used in math, economics, engineering, physics, biology, chemistry, and a host of other disciplines.
It can be difficult to distinguish between a movement due to Brownian motion and movement due to other effects. In biology , for example, an observer needs to be able to tell whether a specimen is moving because it is motile capable of movement on its own, perhaps due to cilia or flagella or because it is subject to Brownian motion.
Usually, it's possible to differentiate between the processes because Brownian motion appears jerky, random, or like a vibration. True motility appears often as a path, or else the motion is twisting or turning in a specific direction.
In microbiology, motility can be confirmed if a sample inoculated in a semisolid medium migrates away from a stab line. Actively scan device characteristics for identification. There was just as much jiggling. Perhaps all organic matter, everything that ever was alive, still contained some mysterious life force at this microscopic level?
Sure enough, he found the movement in tiny fragments of fossilized wood! But then he went on to find it in matter that never was alive — tiny particles of window glass, and even dust from a stone that had been part of the Sphinx. So what was causing it? Perhaps it was evaporation currents, or the incident light energy, or just tiny unnoticed vibrations. But none of these explanations was very satisfactory.
Half a century later, a new possible explanation emerged. The kinetic theory of heat developed by Maxwell, Boltzmann and others was gaining credence. If all the molecules in the fluid were indeed in vigorous motion, maybe these tiny granules were being moved around by this constant battering from all sides as the fluid molecules bounced off. It had been well established that energy always degrades, as friction slows movement kinetic energy goes to heat energy.
This seemed to be the other way round — the molecular battering was certainly disorganized heat energy, but when the granule moved it had evidently gained kinetic energy. Since many scientists regarded the second law as an absolute truth, they were very skeptical of this explanation. He established that it was unaffected by intense illumination or by strong electromagnetic fields.
Despite the second law, Guoy believed — correctly — the random motion was indeed generated by thermal molecular collisions. There's a movie here. A short time later, there might be more people pushing from behind than from in front, and you would move forward. Your motion would be similar to that of a tiny pollen particle suspended in, and constantly being struck by randomly moving molecules of water. The fact that the jiggling movement of a particle exhibiting Brownian motion increases with temperature provided evidence that its motion could be explained by the kinetic molecular theory.
Early in the twentieth century, Albert Einstein published a series of papers in which he statistically analyzed the expected velocity of particles of various sizes and masses undergoing Brownian motion at various temperatures in liquids with different viscosities. In an effort to verify Einstein's theoretical work, Jean Perrin carried out a number of experiments using small uniform particles of known size and mass. His results confirmed Einstein's analysis and put to rest forever any doubts about the molecular nature of matter.
Haber-Schaim, et.
0コメント