Subscribe Email address:. Follow us facebook twitter youtube. Search Search for: Search. You are here: Home Ever Wonder Why? Ever Wonder Why? Search for: Search. Advertisements fund this website. Please disable your adblocking software or whitelist our website. There is an international study on this issue, called Image Resolution of 35mm Film in Theatrical Presentation. In the study, MTF measurements were used to determine the typical resolution of theatrical release prints and answer prints in normal operation, utilizing existing state-of-the-art 35mm film, processing, printing, and projection.
The prints were projected in six movie theaters in various countries, and a panel of experts made the assessments of the projected images using a well-defined formula. The results are as follows:. Measurement Lines. As the study indicates, perceived differences between HD and 35mm film are quickly disappearing. Notice I use the word "perceived. At this point, the typical audience cannot see the difference between HD and 35mm. Even professionals have a hard time telling them apart.
We go through this all the time at NYU "Was this shot on film or video? Again, the study was based on standard HD with lines of horizontal resolution.
We now have ultra HD with 4, lines. Based on this, the debate is moot. The question is not which format is best, but rather, which format is best for your project?
The answer, of course, is based on a balance between aesthetic and budgetary considerations. One of lessons found in Film School Online! Cinematography Course Topics. Answer Print MTF. Release Print MTF. They weren't seeing what most of us were seeing. Dailies projectionists are hardly likely to overlook critical focus, either and the material they were projecting was likely to be fresh from the lab.
Making prints from the cut negative risks that irreplaceable negative being damaged or getting dirty, though. Since it's fundamentally impossible to make a duplicate of the original negative without loss, it was usually handled as little as possible. Modern exhibition is, of course, not perfect. A film projector can produce any colour that the director of photography can conjure out of the emulsion. That isn't a completely unlimited range, of course, but it's probably wider than Rec.
Nothing's actually bigger than , of course, and a perfect display could reproduce almost anything film could, but there's no realistic prospect of achieving that with current tech. Reasonable home displays will also be much brighter if not higher in contrast than film, and film scans of any resolution can be cautiously treated with grain reduction, stabilisation and cleaning processes to reduce the common concerns of film presentation.
Yes, there's compression, but, in the main, if it looks like a modern transfer of a movie on your 4K TV looks better than it did in the cinema, well, it probably does. RedShark is a multiplatform online publication for anyone with an interest in moving image technology and craft. With over 50 contributors worldwide, full-time developers, editorial, sales and marketing staff, it is the go-to site for informed opinion and know-how for the quickly changing video, film and content creation industries.
Release prints are fundementally low 'resolution' It's been estimated that a 35mm release print, even assuming a very clean, high-resolution original negative made carefully on slow stock with sharp lenses resolves perhaps 1. Digital sharpness Digital media has always been better at maintaining sharpness from the camera lens to the projector lens.
Cinerama: This is how the 's revolutionised the big screen experience. Popular Quantum Computing just got desktop sized.
0コメント